being suffered by our US competitors, gives us a strong
opportunity to build market share.
The Asia-Pacific capability is being seen by some as a factor
that polarises the competition among lessors. If you dont have
it already you cant get it so easily, seems to be the thinking.
Rees guesstimates that the competitor landscape in Asia-Pacific
will not be much different in one years time. I do not
foresee a lot more players, he says. The entry costs are high
and there are no significant new vendors on the horizon. On
the other hand, we have been able to lead with our big vendor
relationships.
How does he stay in touch with the Asia-Pacific region from
Europe? Day to day we operate by telephone and
teleconferencing contact. Over the course of a year, different
managers from head office will, for example, travel four times
to China, twice to Australia, and so on. Rees is candid about
the problems of getting the right local staff. We have the right
people now, but we have been through several iterations of
local management in the process.
CIT has hired large numbers of staff in the Asia-Pacific, to
deal with business volumes there. Booking and administration
for the region is centralised in Shanghai but CIT has a unique
operations model. We do not focus on local country P & Ls,
rather profit centres are presented globally for vendors and
other areas of business. We use one IT system, the core of
which is Infolease, with various applications surrounding it.
The power of a centralised system becomes apparent in areas
such as asset management. We can tell our vendors exactly
how many Model As they have and where they are. When
there is a major technological sea-change, for example
changing from analogue to digital, our systems give the vendor
all the details.
This facility is clearly valuable to CITs large global vendors
such as Dell and Microsoft. With Dell supported by CIT across
Europe and Asia-Pacific, the volumes of sales finance at Dell
are growing faster than the volumes of equipment sales.
Microsoft sales finance is starting to take off also, right across
the globe. In the UK there has been a strong cross-pollination
from the purchase of the Barclays technology portfolio, and as
Kelleher says: Its been a good buy.
Is there a significant value to first-mover
advantage in vendor finance?
|
|
The centralised system approach does sound a winner, but most
other lessors say it is impossible to achieve. Schneck of De Lage
Landen feels that for the present a centralised system is feasible
across Europe, but not across the globe. It would be easier if more
could be standardised, but he says: In my experience, every single
country, be it large or small, has been different.
Rees is open about the SGEF systems. At the last count we
had 19 different systems in 22 countries. We are not convinced
that there is one global system available, we see it as a series of
local systems feeding a central database system so we can
provide consolidated information to our vendor partners and
management groups alike. In essence this may not be so
different from CITs Infolease plus surrounding applications
solution. Rees sees more focus on systems and operational
efficiency going forward: Yes, we are ready to respond to big
vendors RFPs, but in practise how often does a big vendor
change providers? So we see the focus of our efforts in the
coming year chanelled into maximising efficiency in existing
programmes.
And what about the competition? Kelleher feels that the
competition does not seem as focused as before. He feels that
most vendor funders are buying paper and simply running a
treasury operation. In the process the sales side is being given
over to independent brokers, who are taking more and more of
the margin.
This may be beggaring the question, though; KBC, Fortis,
GE, ING are all industriously building infrastructure, adding
new countries, dominating new sales channels, and surely they
will inevitably catch up on the Asia-Pacific side? Roger Pullen
of KBC Lease says: At KBC Lease we opened in Italy last year,
and Spain and Romania this year. This expansion is driven
purely by our recognition of the needs of our vendors and the
territories they need to operate in.
Is there a significant value to first-mover advantage in
vendor finance? Based on past experience one would say that
there definitely is; for the period of time they are in front. But
first-movers do not necessarily continue to stay in front
throughout the market cycle; they can stumble, they can end
up being bought and sold in the marketplace, and sometimes it
seems that all it takes is some bright sparks in an investment
bank somewhere to unwittingly throw a spanner in the works,
such as with the liquidity crisis we face today.
|